The Only Double Standard

Story Info
This is the only double standard in gender relationships.
816 words
4.15
30.4k
1
Share this Story

Font Size

Default Font Size

Font Spacing

Default Font Spacing

Font Face

Default Font Face

Reading Theme

Default Theme (White)
You need to Log In or Sign Up to have your customization saved in your Literotica profile.
PUBLIC BETA

Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.

You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.

Click here
Boxlicker101
Boxlicker101
3,144 Followers

All my adult life, and I am nearly 65 years, I have heard and read some women complain about what they call “The double standard” but I have never been able to figure out what was meant by that. Actually, I knew WHAT was meant but I never could figure out WHY anybody thought such a standard existed. There may have been one many years ago, before I would have even had an interest in girls, but there certainly is no such thing now.

I am referring, of course, to the supposed edict that says something like: “It’s okay for men to have all the sexual fun they want, and to sow their wild oats but women are to remain chaste and untouched until they are married and are never to enjoy sex.” To some degree this attitude was held by certain ignorant persons in the United States in the 19th century but for practical purposes, it disappeared during the 1920’s. There are still some persons who believe that women should always remain virgins until they are married but they think the same thing about men so this is hardly a double standard. Many of these same persons also take offense at women wearing shoes and being not pregnant but their numbers are, thankfully, dwindling.

This is not to say there are no double standards when it comes to relationships between men and women. The most flagrant double standard is the one that says that males must be the ones who initiate and maintain relationships. Why is it that boys or men must almost always be the ones who risk rejection and take the first steps in advancing a relationship from casual to dating and perhaps beyond? Why is it that boys or men must almost always be the ones, again risking rejection, who approach females to ask them to dance? Why is it that members of the male gender are required to maintain a constant stream of flowers, telephone calls and gifts to members of the female gender? Why should it be an obligation of men to “pop the question”? How about some sexual equality here?

Some women may claim they do initiate relationships, or at least try to. When they say “Good morning” to a man, they may be twirling their hair in their fingers or doing some other thing which is, they say, an open invitation to him to further the relationship. I have news for these ladies. To almost all men, “Good morning” is a wish by the speaker that the listener should have a good morning. If the speaker is picking her nose or scratching her butt or twirling her hair or twiddling her fingers or whatever else she may be doing, the man doesn’t notice; all he hears are the words being said. If she opens her blouse and shows off her breasts, that would be noticed but with most men, it would take something almost that overt, the proverbial two by four across the forehead. Women complain, often with good reason, that men are not sensitive but it just might be that women are not honest and straightforward enough.

This is referring, of course, to the vast majority of the male population who are not rock stars, professional athletes or successful politicians or are not otherwise highly desirable. Such men are approached by women in hopes of establishing relationships, carnal or otherwise, but this is not the case for almost all men.

Admittedly, there are some men who object to women taking any kind of initiative. Such men probably also object to women showing independence in other ways such as speaking their minds, attending a university, striving for professional careers, succeeding in business, voting, wearing shoes or otherwise being “uppity”. Women who have any kind of independent thought are probably better off avoiding such men because no relationship would ever work out with them anyhow.

If it were to come to pass that women would take an equal share in taking initiatives as I describe, sometimes a man will reject a woman who approaches him, for whatever reason or for no reason at all. Well, ladies, get used to it. Women reject men all the time for good reasons, for poor reasons or for no reason at all. That is life. Rejection hurts but, currently it is almost entirely men who are hurt by it. According to the principle of gender equality, rejection by members of the opposite sex should be an equal opportunity risk.

Except for what I describe here, there is no wide-spread double standard distinguishing men from women in relationships.

Thank you for reading this short essay. I invite your comments, either concurrence or disagreement. I expect most of the women who read this will strongly disagree with me and I especially invite their comments, including vituperation. I will try to respond with reason and logic.

Boxlicker101
Boxlicker101
3,144 Followers
Please rate this story
The author would appreciate your feedback.
  • COMMENTS
Anonymous
Our Comments Policy is available in the Lit FAQ
Post as:
Anonymous
11 Comments
bottovarnisbottovarnisover 2 years ago

Nice work! The closer you get to the truth the angrier people get. Thank you from a 70 year old.

dahlingdolldahlingdollover 9 years ago
That's not a double standard

Gals not approaching guys as much as guys approach gals is not a double standard. A double standard is a rule or principle that is unfairly applied in different ways to different people or groups.

Likely there is no sexual equality since their is still the slut/stud or shitty lock/master key double standard.

bibookwormbibookwormover 10 years ago
Right with you

That isn't the only double standard--I've seen plenty and I'm 41--but I am in full agreement with you on the subject of who initiates the relationship. Women have a list of things men should and shoudn't say when coming on to them. But how many times does a woman come on to a man? Very rarely. We have to approach them, and they need only say "yes" or "no". Who the hell wrote that rule that I have to pursue the woman for a relationship just because I'm the man? I would like to have a woman pursue ME for a change. Let's spread the rejection around a llittle, huh?

If women truly wish assert their sexual independence, they'll stop waiting for the man to make the first move; unfortunately they've been programmed by other women (mainly their mothers) to wait for the man to make the first move. I have always believed that if you want a person badly enough, you go after them with everything you have and to hell with what your friends might say about it. If a woman wants to be in a relationship with me, she can either wait for me to approach her--or she can pursue me. It's not like I'm going to run away from her--this isn't kindergarten.

AnonymousAnonymousover 17 years ago
Check Out The Definition Of Double Standard.

Your essay is littered with problems.

The double standard with regard to sexual activity does still exist. Unless you've never heard of the words slut or stud, which I'm going to assume you haven't. A woman has sex with multiple partners- she's a slut. A man does it- he's a stud. You do realise that the "she was a slut so asked for it" defence is still used in rape cases, right?

Men being "expected" to ask women out is not a double standard. It's just unfair. The double standard comes when women ask guys out, and are branded sluts for doing so.

When a woman says "good morning" and twirls her hair, 99% of men will take this as a come on. Even the bland, mainstream show Friends talked about this.

AnonymousAnonymousover 19 years ago
California isn't the center of the world, is it?

Did you ever happen to think that there are many different sorts of people and cultures around the U.S. I can say that at least in the rural midwest, in the 40 something generation, , the double standard still lives. Women of my generation were taught that to be the sexual aggressor makes you a bad woman or a whore. I'm 40 years old and I can still hear my grandfather and my father for that matter saying to me that I shouldn't initiate a relationship with the man or people would think I was a slut. Women are supposed to just deny their sexuality, drop everything and become mothers and housewive.

Can we talk about fundamentalism or Catholicism? Do you think that there is no double standard for the women of those cultures? I mention it because I used to be a fundamentalist, and my roommate was Catholic.

People who are privileged enjoy criticizing what they think are the unreasonable complaints of minorities.

Show More
Share this Story

Similar Stories

The Royal Urinal A rebellious noble girl gets taught a degrading, wet lesson.in Fetish
Work Meeting Piss Desperation Katie is losing control over her bladder, her enemy helps.in Fetish
The Machine What happens when pleasure becoming overwhelming.in Sci-Fi & Fantasy
How I Get Off Sharing her cunt with another.in Fetish
Squirt Guaranteed A woman takes a one on one squirting course.in Fetish
More Stories